Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Did Tom Cruise & Nicole Kidman refuse to speak to each other at a Globes party?
While I want to believe Page Sixâs Christina Hendricks story with every fiber of my being, Iâm kind of thinking that Page Six is pulling this Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman story out of their ass. According to sources, at the post-Globes CAA party, Tom and Nicole totally avoided each other like they were in frigginâ high school. Ugh.
Tom Cruise and ex-wife Nicole Kidman kept a safe distance from each other as they partied at the same Golden Globes bash. Cruise and wife Katie Holmes attended the Creative Artists Agency party at the Sunset Tower Hotel following the awards. Meanwhile, Kidman, who divorced Cruise in 2001, was across the intimate room with husband Keith Urban.
A spy said, âThere was no drama, but nobody saw them have a conversation, either. Tom and Nicole stayed apart all night, but they must have seen each other. Everybody was mingling, but they kept their distance.â
Security was so tight that many CAA clients werenât allowed in â" even director David O. Russell had to wait in his car after being told he wasnât on the list. Those who got in included Robert De Niro, Jane Fonda, Christina Aguilera, Anne Hathaway, Julianne Moore, Scarlett Johansson, Halle Berry, Oliver Stone, John Legend, Demi Moore and Jake Gyllenhaal.
[From Page Six]
I doubt this just because I doubt Tom Cruise was in town for the Globes - I think heâs still filming Mission Impossible in Canada, last I heard. Considering he wasnât nominated for anything and he didnât present anything at the Globes, why would he fly into LA just for a CAA party? But I do believe that Nicole and Keith were at the CAA party - just the ticket after a three-hour awards ceremony. You want to kick back and schmooze and have a few drinks and not be with your three-week-old newborn baby. Look, I get why Nicole went - she was nominated, after all. But Keith just had to come with her? Why? Because his job is holding her hand in front of cameras, not bonding with their new baby that they just had to have and announce conveniently before the Oscar nominations.
UPDATE: Okay, Iâve just been told that Tom was in town and was at the CAA party. Guess this story is pretty true, and Tom and Nicole really canât even say hello to each other. Gawd.
In other âawkward, CAAâ news, Life & Style is reporting that Scarlett Johansson and Sandra Bullock ran into each other at the same CAA party. Ooh, they got a confirmation from Bullockâs rep too:
As if wearing strikingly similar gowns to the Golden Globes werenât awkward enough, Sandra Bullock and Scarlett Johansson came face-to-face for the first time since Sandraâs very public New Yearâs Eve date with Scarlettâs soon-to-be-ex Ryan Reynolds. Sandraâs rep confirms to Life & Style that the ladies saw each other at a CAA-sponsored award show after party on Jan. 16 in LA.
The last time Scarlett and Sandra were spotted sharing the red carpet was at the 2010 MTV Movie Awards, where they shared a jaw-dropping kiss on stage. But that was before they shared a man.
âScarlett and Sandra had dinner,â an insider tells Life & Style of the actressesâ run-in on Jan. 16. âTheyâve always gotten along so Sandra explained exactly how she felt about the whole Ryan situation. She didnât want anything to get in the way of their friendship. There is no awkwardness between Sandra and Scarlett.â
[From Life & Style]
Sandra Bullock: Always A Girlfriend First. Thatâs the message. And Iâll buy it, too.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
Written by Kaiser
Posted in Nicole Kidman, Sandra Bullock, Scarlett Johansson, Tom Cruise
- Anne Hathaway to guest on Glee [She Knows]
- Starbucks premieres new gut-busting size with a stupid name [D-Listed]
- The best way to cure a hangover [Gawker]
- Fug girls on Christina Hendricks' Globes look [Go Fug Yourself]
- More photos of Scarlett Johansson for Monet [IDLYITW]
- Robert Pattinson at the Globes parties [Popsugar]
- This quote from Jerry O'Connell on his twins is too funny [Celebrity Baby Scoop]
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
32 Responses to âDid Tom Cruise & Nicole Kidman refuse to speak to each other at a Globes party?âI saw video footage of Cruise and Holmes walking into the CAA party, so for whatever reason they were in fact there.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Tom was indeed in L.A. over the weekend and was spotted at some parties with Katie. Most movie sets close down on the days of awards shows. Not to mention the fact that it was Tom and Nicoleâs sonâs birthday yesterday, so he was probably in town for that.
Having said that, this story seems exaggerated. They probably didnât talk, but they probably werenât purposely âignoringâ each other. Theyâve been divorced for 10 years. Their children are pretty much grown. Whatâs there to talk about?
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Itâs interesting that a picture of Sandra Bullock was included in this post, where youâre again bashing Nicole and Keith for taking a few hours away from their baby, since Sandra and her then-husband did the same thing. No one found that horrifying.
And maybe youâre not a parent, so you donât realize this, but itâs perfectly normal for parents of newborns to take a few hours away from the baby. Itâs important for parents to still have some alone time as a couple, and to focus on things other than just the baby. The only couples I know who never took any time away from their babies at this point were people who have no family around and/or canât afford a babysitter.
Also, three-week-olds spend most of their time sleeping. I doubt that Faith was even aware that her parents were gone.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
CAA must throw some wild partiesâ¦donât forget the Julieanne Hough/Christina Aguilera âfeudâ too.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I donât buy this b/c of the detail that David O. Russell wasnât on the list. He was nominated for directing The Fighter & he wasnât on the guest list? So I donât believe Cruise was even there. That said, if he was there, I totally believe theyâd avoid each other. Thatâs some serious bad blood there.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I donât see why a couple canât go out for an important night out if their newborn is being well cared for. That seems like a cheap shot.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
sheeshâ¦Kidman actually used to be pretty.
now sheâs got witchy eyebrows and a wormy lip.
âItâs interesting that a picture of Sandra Bullock was included in this postâ
perhaps because thereâs a story about Bullock in this same post?
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Wait, this woman has all but forgotten that she adopted two kids with her ex and we are shocked she left a probably sleeping and unaware 3 week old for a party - nope, seems about right.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@ Grace: true, but Nicole didnât carry this baby, so from what are she and Keith taking time off?
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Yes, SB did the exact same thing last year (as I mentioned in another comment on a previous story), yet she wasnât vilified. Whatever. As I also mentioned, I like all 3 of them; donât judge any of them; and Iâm a parent, as well.
I totally buy that NK wouldnât speak to TC: heâs brainwashed their mutual children into becoming involved in his pseudo âreligion;â and I would be shocked to learn there WASNâT something in their divorce âagreementâ that the kids had to be raised as Scientologists, at least until the age where they could âdecideâ for themselves to follow Scientology. Remember, TC was the bigger star when all this shite went down, and I doubt NC had much leverage, especially considering his financial power v. hers at the time.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I donât have children (yet), but I have a ton od nieces and nephews. Nothing wrong with parents taking a night off. I used to help my sister watch her newborn daughter all the time when she went back to work. All my baby niece did was poop and sleep. Wasnât a big deal.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Give them a break already. So they went out for an evening without the new baby. How many new parents do that? Lots
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Tom and Katie were there. Vid at X17 - Not posting link but you can see both of them at 2:40.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
co-sign Grace.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Hereâs another couple you didnât bash when both parents left the baby for the evening:
http://www.celebitchy.com/131196/matt_damon_his_poor_wife_luciana_six_weeks_after_she_gave_birth/
So apparently itâs wrong to leave a three-week-old for a few hours but not a six-week-old.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
So Tom Thumb and Zombie Kate are refusing to go to the Oscars because Hathaway is HOSTING, but go to the same intimate party?
Report this comment as spam or abuse
So Sandy is reassuring Scarjo that she isnât boning Ryanâ¦yet. Mmmm k.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Nicole is still upset that she didnt know that she was his beard..she thought she was in love
Report this comment as spam or abuse
god-sandraâs hair is SO awful in that pictureâ¦.is that a wig?
i cannot get past thatâ¦.
and who cares if tom and nicole didnât talk-meh. their choice. no drama IMO
ditto for the âomg! they went out w/o the baby!â comment. Who cares? This is not gossip, and in fact it certainly is not neglecting their child.
Geesh-many of us who are parents, also know that 3 weeks is about the mark when family comes to town and/or offers to watch the baby so you can get some time outâ¦.iâm glad they announced it now, instead of earlier-precisely so they would not be bombarded right away w/paps, stories, etc.
Plus, itâs now in the middle of the awards hoopla-which hopefully makes their baby less of a news story-which Iâm sure they planned, for this reason alone Iâd buy itâ¦.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Why would you want to hang around with your ex? Geesh.. I am not sure I would if he had his wife/friends/cult members hanging out.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Yeah, I wonât bash her for going out. Iâm a mom and a few hours away does not hurt the baby and moms need a break.
As for the rest, itâs probably bs, but I donât blame her for not talking to him, if it is true. I think Tom and his insane âchurchâ are the reason for the separation between Nicole and her kids. Unforgiveable and disgusting.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Well, I was encouraged to get out when my weeâin was born. And I did.
There was not an ounce of guilt about it either. More a feeling of
WOOHOOO IâM FREEâ¦â¦. IâM FREEâ¦..
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Fine. Itâs ALL perfectly normal. Itâs all perfectly fine to pay some huge amount so that someone can carry this baby that you need so, so much, and then when the baby is born, you and your husband spend an entire weekend partying and attending events. Not just going to the Globes, but to the Critics Choice, and the all of the after-parties. Thatâs what ALWAYS strikes me about Nicole Kidman. How normal she is. Just a normal mother of two. Because she consistently forgets about her first two children. Because sheâs so normal.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Nicole and Keith seem like to be involved and loving parents with Sunday. I mean, as much as one can tell from photos, etc. I think itâs ridiculous to be criticizing them for taking one weekend away to attend the GOlden Globes. Nicole may have been contractually obligated to attend due to promo work for Rabbit Hole. She may have attended because itâs her CAREER and she has worked hard to achieve the level of success she is at. Moms who work sometimes have to work (shocker). I doubt a 3 week old baby suffered much from having her parents away for one weekend. Iâm sure it was difficult for Nicole and Keith to be away from the new baby.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Wait, who the f cares if Nicole and Tom didnât talk? So what? I donât want to run into my exes either, and Tomâs a nutbag. Why is that news?
As for the whole surrogacyâ¦I missed yesterdayâs postâ¦holy crap!!!!!! That is just crazy. Good for them. And Iâm not gonna hate on her for taking some time out for herself and Keithâ¦Iâm turning 30 2 weeks after this next baby is born. And I will be seen âoutâ in some capacity.
I also think that Sandy and ScarJo are absolutely fine with eachother, and would never bicker over a boob like Ryan.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
If she werenât nominated and was just going to party, that would be one thing, but she WAS nominated, her career could use the boost, and I donât see a problem with them having a night out here and there.
Maybe when they planned the surrogacy, she didnât expect to be nominated/attending award shows? Who knows. Also donât get the negativity towards her using a surrogate, we donât know their personal/medical reasons, nor should we.
Also not surprised she and Tom didnât talk, it didnât exactly end well and Iâm in the camp that he and his âchurchâ are what have separated Nicole and the older children, if she was ever allowed to be a parent to them at all. Itâs a shame, but I think there is some seriously twisted stuff that goes down there.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
âannounced conveniently before the Oscar nominations.â
The Oscar nominations will be announced on January 25th but the voters ballots were due on January 14th. So your nasty insinuation is absolutely ridiculous. The one who announced her pregnancy right on time for the Oscars is Natalie Portman, not Nicole. And I donât see anything wrong with them going out for 3 or 4 hours. Sandra Bullock did the same thing last year, going to EVERY award/Hollywood ceremonies while she had a few weeks-old baby at home. No one criticized her. The constant hatred towards Nicole Kidman from gossip sites like this one is becoming highly annoying.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@Praise St. Angie: I realize that a picture of Sandra Bullock was included because part of the article was about her. I meant that itâs interesting that this article is about two people who both did the same thing, and one got bashed for it and the other didnât.
@K: Your comment makes no sense. If Nicole had given birth then going out for the evening would not have given her a break from the physical recover process. She would still only be getting a break from the babycare aspect of things.
And I didnât give birth to any of my children, does that mean that I donât get to take a break from parenting now and then? I guess only those who have given birth have a right to get tired, or need a break, or be overwhelmed and need a chance to recharge for a few hours.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
i wonder if sandra and nicole still talk. no reason they wouldnât i just remember really liking them together in practical magic. of course that was when nicole was pretty and nice and didnât have a stick up her ass.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
âAlso not surprised she and Tom didnât talk, it didnât exactly end well and Iâm in the camp that he and his âchurchâ are what have separated Nicole and the older children, if she was ever allowed to be a parent to them at all. Itâs a shame, but I think there is some seriously twisted stuff that goes down there.â
agreed. seriously creepy something going on there.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I havent talked to my x-wife since 2003.True we didnt have any kids but if i saw her at a party i would go out of my way to avoid talking to herâ¦.bitch!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@ Lovely: I couldnât agree more!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
By commenting you agree to our comment policy
Use the "Report this comment as spam or abuse" link to ask the moderators to delete a comment if it's offensive. If your comment disappears, it has been eaten by the spam filter. Please e-mail cbcomments at gmail.com to get it retrieved.
Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar
Webmaster Forum | SEO Forum | Coding Forum | Graphics Forum
No comments:
Post a Comment